Dear IggDawg’s boss,
I spent a 2 days collecting and interpreiting the data for a project I did last week. You reviewed the data because peer review is required. You spent 10 minutes glossing over the results, and you wrote down the changes you wanted me to make to my text. The implication is that your edits are well warranted since you have more experience. I admit I should have checked your notes against my data, but I made changes to my report based on your authority without checking. In one very important section, you wrote a part number wrong and forgot to write down another one. the result of this is that a good part was indicated as bad, and two bad parts weren’t indicated at all.
It displeases me that you made these errors, since my text was fine in the first place. Your “streamlining” was unneccecary. It displeases me further that when the client called out these mistakes, you deferred them to me… you implied the data and report were my product entirely. I had to flounder, coming up with reasons for the discrepancies. The client was satisfied when I was done with them but I am not at all amused that I was put in that position.
I assert that I hate your soul, and kindly request that you fuck off and die.
Sincerely,
-IggDawg
This is why I must start my own company.
Lets open up a tofu shop, I deliver.
-paK +1
I hope you didn’t post this from work. Catass (from nasioc) had network admin rights, and one of her co-workers posted something negative about the their LJ. Catass sent the link to the boss. Be careful, people are brutal.
~~Quentin
yeah I posted it from work. but my boss and I are the only ones at this location. We’re only connected to the main lab by a VPN, and I’m positive the IT guy there can see anything without going to great lengths. So I’m not too worried (just yet).
Damn, I didn’t realize how hard it was to make sense of what I previously wrote. lol
~~Quentin
“mean people suck, nice ones swallow”
-unknown